“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.
However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighborhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters.”
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen, published 1813
Pride and Prejudice would have to be in the Top 10 of my all time favourite books.
Now I know that Jane Austen is not everyone’s ‘cup of tea’, in fact, some would argue that the premise in her books is like a ‘storm in a tea cup’. Compared to the bigger external issues that can be dealt with in literature, that may be so. We mustn’t ever forget though, that if you are IN that ‘tea cup’ the storm can be frighteningly real!
If you are not familiar with this classic, it examines both internal and external conflicts: the negative societal pressures and our internal biases that lead us to make mistakes. Elizabeth and Darcy have to overcome these before they can allow themselves to fall in love and marry.
Although written to depict life in the early 19th century, modern interest in the book has resulted in a number of adaptations and an abundance of novels and stories chaneling Austen’s memorable characters or themes.
This brings me to a book we recently read for book group.
(Honestly, it should have been one of those night’s that I had another engagement!)
A little bit of background first though.
Some books our group had covered prior to this were: Bereft by Chris Womersley, Snowflower and the Secret Fan by Lisa See, Jasper Jones by Craig Silvey.
I’ve read and enjoyed gentle novels such as 84, Charring Cross Road by Helen Hanff and The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows. I quite like though, what I call ‘gritty’ or ‘edgey’ books but the consensus was that a ‘softer’ book was required for the upcoming book group meeting.
The book chosen was The Girl in the Steel-Capped Boots by Loretta Hill, published in 2012.
I could almost feel Jane Austen turning in her grave as this new author tried to ‘channel’ Austen’s Pride and Prejudice premise.
Firstly, there are plenty of references throughout the book to places and names that invoke Jane Austen, e.g. Wickham, Bath.
The protagonists Lena and Dan are poor facsimiles of Elizabeth and Darcy.
This is how Lena describes Dan at first acquaintance:
‘…if only tall, dark and obnoxious…That’s what Barnes Inc staff called Dan Hullog – Bulldog. Apparently, once he got it between his teeth, he didn’t let go – a perfectionist with impossible standards. Apparently, he had an overly critical eye and a penchant for finding the tiniest flaw in anything.’
Sound familiar with how Mr Darcy is considered a:
‘…fine, tall person, handsome features, noble mien” but then ‘…he was discovered to be proud, to be above his company, and above being pleased…having a most forbiding, disagreeable countenance, and being unworthy to be compared with his friend.’
And then the similarities with the initial interactions between Lena and Dan:
‘She walked over to the bicep-building machine and perched on its worn vinyl seat. Dan went back to ignoring her.’
Can you conjure up the ball scene in Pride and Prejudice where Darcy chooses to ignore Elizabeth as a dance partner.
Lena is portrayed as an educated (but with question marks over her qualification) city girl sent to outback Australia to prove her worth. As a female engineer in this environment, she is considered second class. Much the same as The Bennett’s social standing in their community, not quite good enough.
Both books develop the internal and external conflict to arrive at the same conclusion, both sets of protagonists are able to move beyond their pride and prejudice.
Elizabeth is accepted by Darcy and others (except Lady de Burgh) as someone worthy to share his life.
Lena is accepted as a qualified and capable engineer by Dan and others and is able to feel comfortable that she has fairly earned her degree.
Ahhh, isn’t that lovely.
I could make other comparisons between the characters and events in each book, but I think you get my point.
Both authors, using the same premise have resulted in books that to my reading pleasure are vastly different.
Jane Austen, using the society mores in which she has grown up in, uses rich and witty language to create a text that engages me as a reader.
Loretta Hill, using her own experience as an engineer in the Pilbara, failed to excite me with her language and scene depictions.
I do consider Pride and Prejudice to be a good book.
I do NOT consider The Girl in Steel-Capped Boots to be a good book.
Opinions and reading pleasures are personal.
What makes a book good? What do you think?
Nb.A quick search of reviews for the latter book will show you that there are plenty of others who loved the book. Just not me.